Comments on: Knowledge Blog http://knowledgeblog.org Scientific Publishing for the Web Generation Wed, 22 Jun 2011 12:17:28 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.2 By: Frank Bennett (@fgbjr) http://knowledgeblog.org/comment-page-1#comment-11344 Thu, 17 May 2012 21:13:47 +0000 http://knowledgeblog.org/knowledge-blog/#comment-11344 Hi, Phil. Just a note to say that paged returns from makeBibliography() have been implemented in citeproc-js. The code has been through a couple of rounds of testing and bugfixing and should (as of a few minutes ago) be fully operational and do what you need. The usage is described in the original issue thread in the BitBucket repo.

]]> By: admin http://knowledgeblog.org/comment-page-1#comment-3824 Wed, 14 Mar 2012 11:52:02 +0000 http://knowledgeblog.org/knowledge-blog/#comment-3824 Gustaf

Glad you like our idea. I’m not so interested in privacy, as the general idea is for everything to be openly accessible. However, I can see the value of being able to sign things. If you want to discuss this further, please send an email to knowledgeblog@googlegroups.com where it will be easier to discuss things.

]]> By: Gustaf Johansson http://knowledgeblog.org/comment-page-1#comment-3676 Tue, 13 Mar 2012 14:41:48 +0000 http://knowledgeblog.org/knowledge-blog/#comment-3676 Hi guys. I really like your initiative. Maybe it would be possible to combine with my bittorrent proposal using cryptographic signing? Blogs are a fine and smooth tool for everyday work, but when publishing results in a more formal way, I think cryptographic signing and decentralized file sharing is a really nice way to do it. It could also be systematically controlled in a decentralized way. Keeping track of authors ( verifying signatures ).

You could use the same signatures for signing reviews – so you get an automatic “communications framework” with privacy ensured by public key cryptography.

/ Gustaf (PhDc)

]]> By: Marshall Abrams http://knowledgeblog.org/comment-page-1#comment-1446 Tue, 26 Jul 2011 23:28:18 +0000 http://knowledgeblog.org/knowledge-blog/#comment-1446 Sorry about the cynical tone of my post–was in a bad mood for other reasons. Still, I think there are issues that will need to be addressed. (Or just withdraw my posts.)

]]> By: Tal Galili http://knowledgeblog.org/comment-page-1#comment-945 Wed, 22 Jun 2011 12:17:28 +0000 http://knowledgeblog.org/knowledge-blog/#comment-945 Great idea!
I hope you’ll be able to push this forward.
If you’d make an R tag for articles using R, I’d be delighted for you to add it to:
http://www.r-bloggers.com/add-your-blog/
To gain more readership.

]]> By: Daniel Swan http://knowledgeblog.org/comment-page-1#comment-698 Fri, 20 May 2011 09:11:17 +0000 http://knowledgeblog.org/knowledge-blog/#comment-698 Thanks for your comment Joss, it does look like we’re singing from the same sheet. Care to join discussion on knowledgeblog-discus? knowledgeblog@googlegroups.com

]]> By: Joss Winn http://knowledgeblog.org/comment-page-1#comment-687 Thu, 19 May 2011 13:02:05 +0000 http://knowledgeblog.org/knowledge-blog/#comment-687 Hi, It’s great to see this work being done.

I gave this some thought a while ago and wrote about it a bit. Some of this might be of interest to you.

http://joss.blogs.lincoln.ac.uk/2010/10/25/rss-in-rss-out-experimenting-with-wordpress-for-scholarly-publishing/

]]> By: Phillip Lord http://knowledgeblog.org/comment-page-1#comment-436 Wed, 20 Apr 2011 10:36:50 +0000 http://knowledgeblog.org/knowledge-blog/#comment-436 It is true that we are at the beginning, but it’s not true that there is no
real case or example. In fact, knowledgeblog came about as a result of a real
case, which you can see at ontogenesis.knowledgeblog.org. This is a set of
articles written by people who are well known in the their field (ontologies
in this case). Of course, we want to extend this to other areas also, but in
all cases, we are following our own interests — bioinformatics, eScience and
so on. So, we are very much content focused. That said, there is no reason
that knowledgeblog software and process shouldn’t work for other disciplines,
and people are welcome to use the software and the process for this. But for
myself, I don’t want to become a publisher; I do want to publish good science,
straight-forwardly and simply. Knowledgeblog is there to enable this.

]]> By: Jian-Feng, Mao http://knowledgeblog.org/comment-page-1#comment-435 Wed, 20 Apr 2011 09:37:01 +0000 http://knowledgeblog.org/knowledge-blog/#comment-435 knowledgeblog has put forward a blog-based academic publication strategy. That is very interesting and attractive. I would like to take part in.

But, it looks it is just on the its beginning. No real case/example there.

One suggestion is:
At the first step, could you please ask someone (big names or not, in any areas) to act as pioneers to practice your publication strategy? You know, most people would like follow examples, that is easier for them than doing without example.

I have not gone through all the ideas of knowledgeblog. And I am not native English speaker. So, sorry for my misunderstandings.

]]> By: chrysalis school montana http://knowledgeblog.org/comment-page-1#comment-91 Sat, 26 Feb 2011 18:46:13 +0000 http://knowledgeblog.org/knowledge-blog/#comment-91 What you’re trying to do is a mission.This will permit people to discuss and read more about science and technology.I hope you succeed and I will pass along your link to all my pals.Thanks

]]>